On the first post of this blog as well as the second post, we showed the initial letter sent to me from
attorney Stephen R Gibble. He was
asking everyone for permission to sell the property located at 920 Perry Road, in Lititz. One must note that he is nor ever was the attorney for the trust. It would seem rather clear and we will show later that it was clear to him, that all trust members had to agree to the sale of the trust per the trust agreement.
With that said, a very major oversight occurred and I do not know whether this was by mistake or on purpose, either way, the results were the same. According to the Trust itself, requests to payments must be in writing.
The wording is right there in 1. Trust For Our Lives. Not one
Trustee asked for permission to sell the house asset of the Trust listed above as required by the Trust to have been done. It was on July 27th, 2013 that I called Mr Gibble's office and denied the request to sell the Trust asset known as the home located at 920 Perry Road,
Lititz, PA.
Mr Gibble, in his first letter stated in it that a contract had been sent along with the letter that was consent to sell said house. It was not in the envelope. Again, whether this was on purpose or by accident, it is unknown. He claims it was an oversight if that in fact did happen. I never saw it. But again, he is and or was not the attorney for the Trust.
Now getting back to the top letter shown above, please note the date on the letter is August 7th, 2013 and Stephen R Gibble states he is filing a petition in the
Orphan's court on August 14th, 2013 for breach of trust. There was a second letter right after this first letter.
Now according to the petition that Mr Gibble filed, I was required to be at the courtroom.
Federal Law does not allow for such short periods of time to respond to any proceedings. The notice, with
mail delivery included, was less than one week to prepare for any such proceedings. Another violation from what we see. A pattern is starting to emerge.
It is my contention that the purpose for removing me as a Trustee was to prevent me from being able to learn about other Trust
assets and were they have gone to. There is over 1 million dollars missing. I intend on finding out where it went.
Now again, at no time before the filing of the petition against me did any of the Trustees ever request in writing, permission to sell the Trust asset known as the
real estate of 920 Perry Road, Lititz, PA. Instead, Thomas Sharp tried to sell the asset without my knowledge. There is a claim that there were no other Trust assets, again, there is over 1 million dollars missing, how much of that money was in other Trust assets can not be determined and every avenue to learn about such has been blocked from my learning about such. Why? I am going to show that we repeatedly asked to see the books regarding my parents and their care as well as other Trust assets and that each request was either denied or blocked or refused. Isn't that just interesting?
The ultimate question for this post, why is it that Stephen R Gibble can argue one part of the Trust and on the same note, ignore the other in regards to requiring written requests from Trustees as required by the Trust instrument?
Blogs run backward as to how information is presented. Please
refer to the oldest post in order to see the proper order of this story.
In blogs the oldest is where the story begins and the newest
is where the story leaves off waiting for the next post.
